Authors
Jankovicova, B., Bigos, A., Surpeta, B., Silva, M., Brezovsky, J., Dvorak, P.
Abstract
Efficient conversion of polymeric feedstocks for sustainable bioprocessing requires robust strategies for enzyme assembly and cell-surface attachment. In nature, cellulosomes achieve highly efficient lignocellulosic polysaccharide deconstruction through scaffoldin-mediated organization of carbohydrate-active enzymes via specific cohesin-dockerin interactions. These modular binding pairs are therefore attractive tools for synthetic biology and engineered whole-cell biocatalysis, yet their performance has been studied mainly in vitro or in yeast or Gram-positive bacteria. The factors governing their function on microbial surfaces - particularly those of Gram-negative bacteria - remain incompletely understood. Here, we investigated the binding efficiency and interaction stability of two thermophilic cohesin-dockerin pairs from Acetivibrio thermocellus and Acetivibrio clariflavus displayed on the surface of the genome-streamlined strain Pseudomonas putida EM371 using an Ag43-based display system from Escherichia coli and a dockerin-tagged fluorescent reporter. We show that binding efficiency is strongly affected by the temperature at which the cohesin-dockerin complex is formed. We further demonstrate that the interaction stability of the A. clariflavus pair can be substantially improved by targeted amino acid substitutions in the dockerin domain guided by molecular dynamics simulations and free-energy calculations. These results identify key parameters controlling the performance of thermophilic cohesin-dockerin modules on living bacterial cell surfaces and establish a computation-guided strategy for engineering more stable cellulosome-derived assembly interfaces, advancing the development of modular whole-cell platforms for sustainable biotechnology applications.
Preprint server:
bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Aug 2026.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 9
- Comments 0