Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Sex-specific dichotomy of chronic mild stress effects on blood pressure and longitudinal measurements of renal sympathetic nerve activity: are females really protected?

Created on 11 Aug 2026

Authors

Komnenov, D., Uthman, Y., Ramirez, N., Banek, C. T.

Abstract

Modulation of renal nerves to improve blood pressure (BP) control has become a topic of intense investigation over the last 10-15 years. Given that renal innervation is composed of mixed nerve fibers containing both afferent (sensory) and efferent (sympathetic) fibers, subsequent preclinical studies have been investigating their respective roles in hypertension pathobiology in different genetic and salt-sensitive rat models. Here we set out to investigate how renal afferent and efferent nerves regulate hypertension development in the chronic mild stress model (CMS). We show that in male CMS rats, ablation of afferent renal nerves (ARDNx) and all renal nerves (TRDNx) resulted in similar BP (104 +/- 2 mmHg vs. 101 +/- 3 mmHg, respectively), both reduced compared to the SHAM group (118 +/- 1 mmHg, p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively) arguing for a prominent role of afferent renal nerves in CMS hypertension. Additionally, we show a reduction of vasopressin (AVP) V1b but not V1a receptor abundance in ARDNx CMS males but not females, suggesting that afferent renal nerves are involved in increase in BP via V1b AVP receptor. We additionally show that despite normal BP, female CMS rats display increased renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA; 2.39 +/- 0.23 bursts/beat vs. 1.44 +/- 0.12 bursts/beat, p < 0.005) measured directly with implanted telemetry in conscious rats over one week and aortic stiffness, as evidenced by increased aortic pulse wave velocity (173.2 +/- 50.9 mm/s vs. - 10.7 +/- 54.6 mm/s in controls, p = 0.0393).

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement