Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Walking alone to the north: The origin and historical expansion of the polyploid parthenogenetic lineage in a weevil

Created on 12 Aug 2026

Authors

Murakami, S., Hsu, P.-W., Sato, T., Matoba, I., Dobata, S.

Abstract

Polyploid parthenogenetic organisms are distributed nonrandomly with respect to their diploid sexual relatives, and this pattern has been well documented in plants. Comparable cases are rare in animals, and their origin has been reconstructed in only a few taxa. Separating general eco-evolutionary processes from taxonomic idiosyncrasy therefore requires further animal examples of independent origin. Here we studied the flightless weevil Catapionus nebulosus species group, in which polyploid females were reported by early karyological work. We surveyed the group across its Japanese range to reconstruct its phylogenomic background from mitochondrial DNA and genome-wide SNPs. The sex ratio shifted sharply toward females in northern Japan. The all-female lineage had a single origin, carried a signal of hybridization between two divergent sexual lineages, and experienced rapid expansion in range and population size. The lineage was polyploid, and unmated females reared in isolation produced fertile female offspring. The effective population size, as estimated by the larval density and genetic diversity of the sexual populations, both declined toward the northern margin of their distribution range, already south of the co-occurrence zone with the parthenogenetic lineage. Mate limitation offers the most plausible explanation for the northward spread of the parthenogen. This species group adds an animal example of polyploid parthenogenesis and offers a system for testing why such lineages persist beyond the range of their sexual relatives.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 12 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement