Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Mismatch Negativity and General Cognitive Ability - A Meta-Analysis

Created on 12 Aug 2026

Authors

Noeth, T., Euler, M., Hilger, K.

Abstract

Intelligence or general cognitive ability (GCA) is fundamental to human behavior and cognition. It impacts important life outcomes like educational success and even health and longevity have been related to differences in GCA. Understanding the biological basis of such individual variations presents a crucial goal of neuroscience. The mismatch negativity (MMN) is an event-related brain potential that can be measured when, within a series of frequent standard stimuli, rare deviants are presented, and is suggested to reflect conscious (active) or unconscious (passive) detection processes of the brain. Importantly, variations in MMN amplitude and latency have been linked to differences in GCA. Yet findings vary considerably. This preregistered meta-analysis provides a comprehensive and structured overview of the current state of research. Following the study selection process in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, and the rating of study design quality with the Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device for Individual Difference Research (DIAD-ID), the association between GCA and MMN amplitude and latency was examined in 695 healthy adults across 13 included studies. The estimated across-sample associations between MMN and GCA were small, but significant (MMN amplitude GCA: r = -0.08, MMN latency GCA: r = -0.13; p < 0.05) and moderators were identified. Between-sample heterogeneity was moderate, with no evidence of publication bias. Our findings suggest that higher cognitive ability is associated with slightly stronger and faster MMN responses. However, the low estimated across-sample effect sizes and the small number of included studies also highlight the need for more research.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 12 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 21
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement