Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Neural fiber orientations across spinal cord gray matter

Created on 13 Aug 2026

Authors

Soerensen, S. F., Kaur, J., Berg, R.

Abstract

Understanding connectivity within the nervous system is central to understanding its function, and the network architecture of many brain regions has been mapped in fine detail. The sub-tract organization of neuronal projections within the human cord, particularly in gray matter is essentially unknown. Since full connectomic reconstruction is currently intractable at this scale, a tractable first step is to statistically characterize neurite orientations across spinal regions. Here we combine a ~400 hour 9.4T ex vivo high-angular-resolution diffusion-weighted MRI spanning all segments (C1-S5) of a post-mortem human spinal cord with structure-tensor analysis of SMI-32 neurofilament fluorescence microscopy to map neurite orientation across the cord. We find that projection geometry varies systematically along the rostro-caudal axis. Cervical, lumbar, and sacral gray matter exhibit low anisotropy, high orientation dispersion, and predominantly transverse fiber populations (>91% of orientations), consistent with dense segment-local circuitry. Thoracic gray matter is categorically distinct from the rest of the cord with elevated axial diffusivity, white-matter-like anisotropy, and a fiber orientation distribution in which 60% of orientations run within a polar angle of 85-95{degrees} i.e., along the the cord's rostro-caudal axis. Micron-resolution microscopy independently supports this longitudinal architecture. Together, these findings reveal a regional dissociation in spinal gray-matter wiring and suggest a coupling between projection geometry and the distinct processing demands of each segment.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 13 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement