Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A pooled genetic approach provides multimodal access to uncharacterized retinal ganglion cell subtypes

Created on 14 Aug 2026

Authors

Luong, N. H., Hougham, O., Leffler, J., Sivyer, B., Wright, K. M.

Abstract

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) are the sole output neurons of the retina, responsible for transmitting visual information to the brain. Recent transcriptomic studies have revealed extensive molecular diversity among RGCs that parallels their known morphological and functional heterogeneity. Although large-scale efforts have unified the transcriptomic, morphological, and physiological features for a limited number of RGC subtypes, the majority of molecularly defined types remain poorly characterized. Developing approaches that can be used to identify RGC subtypes in a reliable and reproducible manner is critical for understanding their roles in visual processing. We used a MafbmCherry-2A-Cre mouse line to genetically label four uncharacterized RGC subtypes, along with two well-established -RGC subtypes, and we systematically characterized their molecular markers, central brain targets, dendritic morphologies, and light response properties. Within the population of previously uncharacterized MAFB+ RGCs, we identified two OFF-responsive subtypes which we termed MAFB-midi-OFF and MAFB-asymmetric-OFF, and two ON-OFF-responsive subtypes termed MAFB-equal bistratified and MAFB-unequal bistratified. Notably, no single molecular, morphological, or functional characteristic was sufficient to distinguish all MAFB+ subtypes. Instead, accurate subtype classification emerged only through the integration of multiple complementary features, highlighting the importance of multimodal approaches for defining RGC subtype identity and resolving neuronal diversity within the retina.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 14 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement