Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Single-cell spatial multi-omic characterization of the tumour microenvironment in transformed follicular lymphoma

Created on 16 Aug 2026

Authors

Wu, S., Lee, E., Fratzscher, A.-S., Lytle, A., Martin, S. D., Hsu, T., Telenius, A., Yin, Y., Fong, A., Rai, S., Fujisawa, M., Cheung, H., Aparicio, S., Huntsman, D. G., Aoki, T., Scott, D. W., Steidl, C., Roth, A.

Abstract

Histological examination of follicular lymphoma (FL) biopsies remains the cornerstone for diagnostic grading of FL. Single-cell sequencing approaches, while transcriptomically rich, require tissue dissociation and lose the native spatial context that underpins FL transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). To investigate the spatial interplay between malignant B-cells and the tumour microenvironment (TME) across disease states, we performed subcellular single-cell spatial transcriptomics and spatial proteomics on 12 paired pre/post-transformation samples and 10 non-transforming FL controls, integrated with matched single-cell whole genome sequencing (scWGS). Our analysis reveals that transformation is accompanied by a shift toward B-cell-predominant stromal and immunosuppressive cellular neighbourhoods, where the magnitude of expansion correlates with time to transformation. Prior to transformation, immunomodulatory Galectin-9 interactions move from the intra-follicular core to the extra-follicular space. Integration with scWGS demonstrates that high copy-number instability in malignant B-cells is associated with reduced supportive T-cell niches and intensified immunoregulatory crosstalk at the transformed state. Collectively, our multi-omic analysis characterizes TME remodeling during FL transformation, contributing to a refined disease evolution model.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 16 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 19
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement