Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Persisting perceptual abnormalities in psychedelic users are associated with conditioned hallucinations and impaired sensory processing

Created on 18 Aug 2026

Authors

Greenwald, M. S., Waade, P. T., Kafadar, E., Bond, A. K., Firisz, D., Nehrer, S. W., Ibragimova, S., Powers, A. R.

Abstract

Serotonergic psychedelics (SP) are increasingly used in clinical research and naturalistic settings, but their psychotic-like side effects, including persisting perceptual abnormalities (PPAs), are poorly understood. Psychosis-associated hallucinations are associated with susceptibility to conditioned hallucinations and computationally-estimated overweighting of perceptual expectations, or priors. However, SPs are widely argued to reduce prior weighting. We surveyed 186 naturalistic SP users on prior SP use, SP-associated PPA history, and current PPAs. Participants completed the visual conditioned hallucinations (VCH) task, in which conditioning induces perception of absent stimuli. Behavioral data were used to fit parameters of a computational model to estimate latent states driving percepts and responses. Past and current PPAs were associated with younger age at first use and higher SP doses, lower visual thresholds, higher VCH rate and confidence, and reduced sensory discrimination. Among model parameters, however, only reduced decision precision tracked both measures and mediated the dose-PPA relationship; relative prior weighting rose equivocally, as expected when priors and sensory evidence gain precision together. SP-related PPAs may therefore arise from a noisy visual system biased toward detection, in which priors act as templates that convert sensory noise into expected percepts. These findings may point to a tractable model for how psychotic-like perception emerges.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 18 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement