Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Quantification of X-chromosome inactivation in fibroblast and iPSC models of UBQLN2 ALS/FTD using allele-selective qPCR

Created on 18 Aug 2026

Authors

Gordon, D. C., Thumbadoo, K. M., Naidoo, S., Nishimura, A. L., Rodrigues, M., Fraser, H., Cutrupi, A. N., Roxburgh, R. H., Shaw, C. E., Kennerson, M. L., Scotter, E. L.

Abstract

Pathogenic missense variants in the X chromosome gene UBQLN2 cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), often accompanied by frontotemporal dementia (FTD). As an X-linked gene, UBQLN2 is subject to X chromosome inactivation (XCI), a process wherein one X chromosome in each cell is randomly inactivated to a Barr body throughout the body in females, creating a mosaic of allelic expression in the tissues of heterozygotes. Despite heterozygous females constituting a majority of reported cases of UBQLN2-linked ALS/FTD, and the known influence of XCI on neurological disorders at large, no current disease models account for XCI. Here we report the characterisation of 12 iPSC clones carrying the ALS/FTD-causing p.T487I (c.1460C>T) UBQLN2 variant. These clones, originally derived from 3 heterozygous carrier fibroblast lines, underwent validation of homeostatic Barr body retention. Erosion of XCI in a subset of the lines was correlated with biallelic expression (of both wildtype and mutant UBQLN2), as measured through a novel allele-selective qPCR (AS-qPCR) assay and verified by amplicon-based Illumina sequencing and Sanger chromatogram quantification, enabling selection of iPSC clones best retaining XCI. Together, this UBQLN2 AS-qPCR assay and selected iPSC clones will enable studies of the role of XCI and its skew in female resilience to UBQLN2 p.T487I-linked ALS/FTD and enable development of allele-selective therapies.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 18 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement