Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

PC1-guided transcriptomic stratification reveals hepatic transcriptional heterogeneity and defines a myeloid-associated 20-gene signature

Created on 20 Aug 2026

Authors

Li, Z., Xie, F., He, Y., Ma, L., Liu, Q.

Abstract

Hepatic lipid-associated inflammation contributes to metabolic liver disease and cardiometabolic complications. Treatment-based transcriptomic comparisons can obscure inter-individual heterogeneity when animals exposed to the same experimental condition show divergent molecular responses. In the public hyperlipidemic liver transcriptomic dataset GSE338111, conventional sex-adjusted comparison of Amlexanox versus DMSO identified only 21 differentially expressed genes at FDR < 0.05 and |log2FC| [≥] 1, and submission of this DEG set to Metascape yielded no GO Biological Process enrichment result. We therefore applied treatment-independent, PC1-guided transcriptomic stratification based on the 500 most variable genes. This analysis resolved three PC1-derived groups and enabled derivation of a myeloid-associated 20-gene signature from the G2-versus-G1 contrast. Independent bulk-transcriptomic cohorts supported responsiveness of the signature to dietary challenge and pharmacologic intervention, while single-cell analysis localized its expression predominantly to hepatic myeloid populations. Human cis-eQTL Mendelian randomization and colocalization further identified TAGLN2 as the signature gene with the strongest genetic support for coronary heart disease. Together, these findings show that PC1-guided stratification can improve resolution of heterogeneous hepatic transcriptional responses and provide a cross-cohort molecular signature for subsequent mechanistic and translational evaluation.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 20 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement