Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Dominance hierarchies are structured similarly in females and males across primate groups

Created on 20 Aug 2026

Authors

Spicher, L., Huchard, E., Lukas, D.

Abstract

Classic socio-ecological theory predicts that males and females experience different sources and mechanisms of social competition. Whether these differences translate into sex-specific structural properties of dominance hierarchies remains unclear. Here, we compiled 156 dominance interaction matrices from 80 published studies and extracted three commonly used metrics - hierarchy steepness, linearity and the directional consistency index - to investigate the structural characteristics of male and female dominance hierarchies across primates. All three metrics were strongly affected by methodological and demographic variables. Steepness increased with the number of recorded interactions and group size, linearity decreased as matrices became sparser, and directional consistency declined with increasing numbers of interactions. Steepness covaried positively with both linearity and directional consistency, indicating that groups with steeper hierarchies also exhibited more linear and more directionally consistent relationships. We found no sex differences in steepness, linearity or directional consistency. These results suggest that current metrics primarily reflect variation in the sampling effort and the rate of interaction of the recorded behaviour and appear therefore not to capture potential sex differences in the forms of competition. Our findings highlight the need for alternative measures of power asymmetries that are less confounded by sampling effort and demographic variation to better understand how competition and conflict are structured across primate societies.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 20 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement