Fitness effects of copper selection in a wild-derived population of Drosophila melanogaster

Authors

Everman, E. R., Rodriguez, C. M., Arnold, K. A.

Abstract

Copper is an essential micronutrient in most organisms that becomes toxic in large quantities. Repeated or prolonged sub-lethal exposure can lead to evolved resistance to copper toxicity over many generations, which may result in trade-offs between energetically expensive detoxification mechanisms and fitness. Alternatively, evolved resistance to chemical stressors may lead to correlated changes in other traits. This study focuses on a population of flies for which artificial selection for copper resistance led to an increase in both copper resistance and longevity. The apparent off-target benefit of copper selection on one component of fitness led us to investigate differences in fecundity and developmental viability in copper resistant and copper sensitive, non-selected populations. We assessed the effect of copper selection and copper exposure on multiple aspects of fecundity over the lifespans of females from the non-selected and copper-selected populations. Our study corroborated previously observed increased longevity in copper-selected flies. Controlling for variation in lifespan, copper-resistant females had comparable age-matched fecundity to copper-sensitive females and benefitted from increased longevity with higher lifetime fecundity. Overall, copper exposure negatively affected egg quality, but we found no difference in this trait between the copper-resistant and sensitive populations. Further, we found developmental viability under copper stress was significantly higher for eggs laid by copper-resistant females. Overall, we determined that copper resistant flies experienced a fitness benefit through both lifespan and fecundity. Costs of maintaining copper resistance may be associated with energetic costs, but these trade-offs may not always manifest in reproductive or lifespan fitness costs.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 23 Aug 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.