Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Molecular size dominates α2-adrenergic subtype-selectivity benchmarks: five controls for reducing attrition in selective ligand design

Created on 24 Aug 2026

Authors

Nael, M. A., Elokely, K.

Abstract

Background: Subtype-selectivity predictions are scored against measured selectivity and judged against an assumed noise ceiling. We asked what an 2-adrenergic benchmark rewards and which controls change its interpretation. Research design and methods: On a frozen benchmark of 586 paired 2A/2C compounds we evaluated Glide SP docking, CNN rescoring, ligand-only fingerprint models, receptor descriptors and pose contacts, with dopamine D3/D2 as comparator, applying five controls: a measured ceiling, a cluster-identity null, a nonselective reference, a same-receptor floor and a trivial-descriptor baseline. Results: Five descriptors from SMILES reached Spearman 0.645, 72% of the measured ceiling, against 0.071 for Glide SP and 0.188 for CNN rescoring; receptor properties and pose contacts reduced to size under control, while a non-size signal of 0.258 survived. Measured rather than propagated noise raised that ceiling from 0.704 to 0.897; cluster identity alone reached R2 0.499 on D3/D2 and none on 2; a nonselective reference received +1.43 to +4.79 kcal/mol where zero is expected; and a same-receptor floor reached 1.77-fold against 1.88-fold across subtypes. Conclusions: Such benchmarks reward molecular size first; a method must exceed 0.645 before its score indicates structural reasoning. The controls are inexpensive; conclusions rest on two receptor pairs, a three-pair floor and static structures.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 24 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement