Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Island Biogeography Theory-inspired predictions reveal that urban non-native plant richness is source dependent and defies classical isolation predictions

Created on 25 Aug 2026

Authors

Sedibana, L., Yessoufou, K.

Abstract

Although cities are increasingly recognized as ecological islands, a unified framework explaining their susceptibility to alien plant invasion remains lacking. Using the most recent and comprehensive global dataset of urban alien plants, we modelled alien richness, mimicking island biogeography theory (IBT). Across all models, neither city size nor geographic isolation independently explained alien richness. Instead, richness was consistently associated with their interaction, supporting the central IBT prediction. However, the strength of this interaction depends on how city size was quantified, with socio-economic dimensions exhibiting stronger positive interactions with geographic isolation than physical measures of city size. Introduction-hub identity further modified these relationships. North America was the only hub for which the interaction between city size and isolation was consistently weakened, indicating that donor regions of alien plants are not ecologically equivalent. Simulations of simultaneous increases in city size and isolation showed that larger, more connected cities generally accumulated more alien plants despite increasing geographic distance, but the magnitude and direction of these responses are hub dependent. Our findings inspire an extension of classical IBT to a mechanistic explanation for global variation in urban alien plant richness in this increasingly urbanized and globally connected world.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 25 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 20
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement