Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models for molecular property prediction are increasingly deployed in drug discovery, yet their adoption in real-world scenarios requires an understanding of the conditions in which a model succeeds or fails. While standardized benchmarks are powerful instruments to measure and unlock progress in ML research, they should not be blindly treated as the end goal. Especially static and retrospective benchmarks, in which no true unknown test set is employed, limit our ability to robustly validate a model's performance. Building on the collective expertise of a cross-industry consortium, we present a model validation framework consisting of five recommendations that would enable the community to move beyond aggregate metrics toward understanding where and why molecular property prediction models fail. We connect evaluation choices to real-world applications and case studies encountered in pharmaceutical research. The framework proposes splitting strategies that mimic realistic distribution shifts and expose common failure modes. We apply the recommended framework to a recently released dataset of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties. Across two complementary model algorithms, our case studies reveal four distinct failure modes (extrapolation, interpolation, representation, and evaluation), showing that model errors arise not only from distribution shift but also from limitations in molecular representations. Our results show that commonly used evaluation protocols can significantly overestimate performance and may not detect important model failure modes. All software and data are released via https://github.com/srijitseal/polaris.
Preprint server:
bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 25 Aug 2026.
Advertisement
Stats
- Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
- Views 42
- Comments 0