Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

From sailing to steam trawling: the evolution of bottom trawl effort in the North Sea

Created on 26 Aug 2026

Authors

Rijnsdorp, A. D., Bennema, F. P., Veenstra, F., Eigaard, O. R., Thomassen, J. A.-C., McLaverty, C.

Abstract

Bottom trawls have been used for centuries, yet studies of their impact on marine ecosystems have largely been restricted to recent decades. Here, we reconstruct fishing effort for the international trawler fleets in the North Sea from the age of sail to early steam trawling, by synthesising historical data describing vessel numbers and specifications, gear dimensions, fishing grounds, and operational characteristics. The trawler fleet increased from ca 800 sailing vessels in the 1820s to ca 3500 at the peak in sail trawling in the 1880s. Subsequently, steam trawling fleets emerged, increasing to almost 2000 vessels in the 1910s, while sailing fleets declined. Trawling grounds, covering ca 7% of the North Sea in 1820s, expanded from coastal to offshore grounds, reaching ca 25% in the 1880s, and 46% in the 1910s after the transition to steam trawling. Using a hydro- and aerodynamic approach to model the wind conditions required for sail trawling, we show that about 55% to 80% of the time at sea was suitable for trawling, providing a new quantitative basis for estimating historical fishing effort. The surface area swept by the trawl per year increased from 35,000 km2 in 1820s to 225,000 km2 in 1880s and 500,000 km2 in 1910s, corresponding to ca 60% of present levels. The trawling intensity (swept area ratio) varied between 0.9-1.7 year-1 in the era of sail, increasing to ca 2.0 in the 1910s. The trawling footprint (unique area trawled) increased to 160,000 km2, about half the present level.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 26 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement