Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Artificial Intelligence Model: Optimizing Cancer Risk Level Predictions Using Machine learning and deep learning approaches

Created on 26 Aug 2026

Authors

Abd Aziz, A. B., Arabiat, A., Abu Owida, H., Abuowaida, S., Alshdaifa, N., A. Mashagba, H.

Abstract

This study emphasizes the potential of computational techniques in cancer risk assessment, lighting opportunities for specific and data-driven healthcare solutions. This study examines the use of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) approaches to improve cancer risk assessment using a Kaggle dataset. The study uses Java-based ML software to create and evaluate multiple predictive models, taking advantage of its powerful libraries and frameworks for processing and analyzing cancer risk indicators. This work analyzes model performance using 10-fold cross-validation, resulting in reliable generalization and accuracy estimates. Several classification techniques, such as Random Forest (RF) logistic regression (LR), decision trees (DT), Naive Bayes (NB), and Multi-layer perceptron (MLP), are used to assess their efficacy in predicting risk levels for various cancer types. To measure classification effectiveness, key performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score are produced, in addition to multi-class confusion matrices. The results show that the RF model is the best classifier for classification, with accuracy of 99.85%, F-measure of 99.80%, precision of 99.80%, and sensitivity of 99.90%. These findings demonstrate the model's ability to effectively estimate cancer risk levels among individuals. of cancer risk estimations, allowing for earlier discovery and more effective medical care.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 26 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement