Briefer than brief - uncovering the true temporal resolution of the visual system

Authors

de Jong, J., Sergent, C., Wexler, M.

Abstract

The temporal resolution of vision is seriously limited. However, the response to a very brief flash, called the impulse response, is already quite sluggish at the earliest stages of vision, potentially obscuring the true temporal resolution of the rest of the visual system. Faster monitors that produce briefer flashes are subject to diminishing returns because, by definition, they cannot elicit responses that are any briefer than the impulse response. Here, taking inspiration from previous attempts, we develop a novel technique for presenting flashes that elicit 'briefer-than-brief' visual responses. Using a simple deconvolution technique, we reverse-engineer the visual response and estimate the form that the stimulus should take to elicit the response that a faster visual system would produce to a normal flash. Using psychophysics on human observers, we demonstrate that these 'briefer-than-brief' (BTB) flashes partially bypass the temporal limits presumably imposed by the early visual system using two paradigms: one that requires temporal segregation and one that requires temporal integration of sequential flashes. With BTB flashes, human observers successfully isolated two successive flashes at shorter intervals than with conventional flashes, improving temporal resolution by around 16%. We found that BTB stimuli not only improved temporal resolution, but also induced poorer performance on tasks requiring temporal integration, suggesting that the visual responses elicited by BTB flashes overlap less in time due to their briefer duration. In sum, our findings suggest that, using reverse-engineered stimuli, we can alleviate a temporal bottleneck that probably originates from the earliest stages of vision. In doing so, we allow higher visual areas to operate at a higher temporal resolution than previously thought possible.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 26 Aug 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.