Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Adapting Social Operant Paradigms to Measure Postpartum Maternal Motivation

Created on 26 Aug 2026

Authors

Ku, S. A., Nyakoa, J., Miranda, G., Bangasser, D. A.

Abstract

Operant paradigms are powerful tools to quantify motivation and reward. Traditionally, operant conditioning research has been limited to food and drug reinforcers. Recent advances in commercially available operant equipment, however, allow for the quantification of social motivation. These operant assays are an improvement over commonly used social preference tasks, as they enable direct measurement of the effort and motivation driving social behavior. Based on a design by Venniro et al. (2020), the MedPC social operant boxes modify the traditional operant box setup for social interactions. The experimental rat can lever-press to raise a door for an interaction with a target rat behind a porous barrier. These social operant boxes have been widely adapted to test social behavior in adult and adolescent rodents and investigate how a range of conditions (e.g. stress, drug taking, etc.) affect social motivation. However, there is a gap in assessing maternal motivation for pups during the postpartum period, despite ample evidence that postpartum social behavior is highly relevant for offspring health outcomes. Here, we detail 3D-printed modifications to the standard Med PC social operant boxes to adapt the social target chamber to safely house neonatal pups. We have also developed testing protocols to assess motivation during the limited postpartum period. These data demonstrate that, with simple modifications to social operant chambers and testing protocols, the field can implement advanced behavioral approaches to directly assess maternal motivation.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 26 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement