Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

TIDE: Tractography-Informed Dose Estimation for individualised TMS intensity

Created on 26 Aug 2026

Authors

Tagliaferri, M., Cattaneo, L., Miniussi, C., Brancaccio, A.

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is commonly dosed by setting stimulation intensity as a fixed percentage of the resting motor threshold (RMT), although a motor-derived intensity may not produce comparable neural recruitment across non-motor targets. We present TIDE (Tractography-Informed Dose Estimation), an open-source, SimNIBS-based pipeline designed to derive individualised stimulation intensities for non-motor white-matter targets. TIDE combines individual RMT measurements, finite-element electric-field modelling and diffusion MRI tractography to rescale the stimulation intensity according to the geometry and stimulation efficiency of the pathway of interest. Specifically, it computes the activating function along subject-specific streamlines and estimates the stimulator output, expressed as a percentage of maximum stimulator output, required for the target pathway to reach the activation level produced in the corticospinal tract at RMT. In an independent dataset of 19 participants, in which stimulation had been dosed conventionally as a fixed percentage of RMT, the relative difference between delivered and TIDE-estimated intensity was associated with the magnitude of TMS-induced behavioural effects at two frontal aslant tract (FAT) stimulation sites, while the delivered intensity alone was not. TIDE therefore extends conventional E-field dosing from cortical field magnitude to subject-specific pathway geometry, providing a method to move beyond the assumption of homogeneous pathway engagement while accounting for inter-individual variability in pathway-specific stimulation efficiency.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 26 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement