Assessing the translation of AI-prioritized genome-derived peptide fragments into validated antimicrobial candidates

Authors

Ojeda, S., Avila, P., Castellanos, S., Lemaitre, P., Ruiz-Ramirez, V., Manrique-Moreno, M., Celis Ramirez, A. M., Arbelaez, P., Leidy, C., Munoz-Camargo, C.

Abstract

The emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus demands accelerated antimicrobial discovery strategies. Artificial intelligence (AI) enables large-scale inference of candidate antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), yet experimental validation remains essential to determine whether predictions translate into biological function. Genome-guided mining, rather than unconstrained or randomly generated sequence exploration, offers a biologically grounded search space derived from organisms shaped by ecological and evolutionary pressures. Here, we evaluate this principle using Malassezia furfur, a skin-associated yeast that coexists with bacterial colonizers such as S. aureus, as a genomic source for AI-prioritized antimicrobial candidates. Candidate fragments were generated from two M. furfur genomes, filtered by physicochemical properties, prioritized with deep-learning AMP predictors, synthesized, and experimentally characterized. Selected peptides underwent cross-kingdom antimicrobial screening against S. aureus, combining kinetic growth and ultrastructural assays, complemented by in silico structural prediction, lipid-membrane interaction analysis, and human keratinocyte cytotoxicity evaluation. AI-guided genomic mining enriched biologically motivated sequence space for peptides with measurable antimicrobial activity, while revealing biases and generalizability limits of AI-based AMP inference. Closing the loop between genome-derived candidate generation, AI-based inference, synthesis, and functional characterization, this study provides an experimental assessment of model-guided AMP discovery and a reproducible route from computational prediction to validated antimicrobial candidates.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 27 Aug 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.