Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Preferential innervation of endometriosis by hyperexcitable Ret/GFRα1+ nociceptors associates with target GDNF and clinical pain

Created on 27 Aug 2026

Authors

Dourson, A., Fluegel, M., Kim, A., Mwirigi, J., Morales, M. E., Borja, R., Golden, J., Bardawil, E., Ross, W., Nahman-Averbuch, H., Gereau, R.

Abstract

Endometriosis is a prevalent condition characterized by chronic pelvic pain that is frequently refractory to treatment. While the mechanisms underlying this pain remain poorly defined, clinical evidence often indicates that lesion innervation, but not disease stage (e.g. number and depth of lesions), correlate with pelvic pain severity. However, characterization of lesion-innervating neurons is incomplete, revealing an opportunity to identify novel, disease-modifying therapeutics. Here, we coupled functional analyses of lesion-innervating neurons in a mouse model with concurrent identification and characterization of lesion-innervating neurons from pain-phenotyped endometriosis patients. Following the confirmation of abdominal-directed pain-like behaviors in the mouse model, electrophysiological analysis revealed that lesion-innervating dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons are hyperexcitable compared to matched controls. These neurons are predominantly small-diameter and bind Isolectin B4, an established marker of the GDNF Family Ligand receptor, Ret. GDNF is concentrated within the stromal layer of both mouse and human lesions, adjacent to axons expressing the GDNF co-receptor, GFR1. Critically, clinical pain correlates with lesion GDNF level, axonal density, and neuronal GFR1 levels. These data provide evidence that endometrial lesions may recruit the Ret-positive subpopulation of nociceptors where they become sensitized and increase patient pain.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 27 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement