Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

NeuroMesh: A Bottleneck Topology Controller for Missing-Modality Brain Tumor Segmentation - A Mechanistic Pilot Study on BraTS

Created on 28 Aug 2026

Authors

Kamalakannan, N. K., Kamalakannan, J.

Abstract

Deep segmentation networks can degrade sharply when an expected MRI sequence is unavailable at inference. We present NeuroMesh, a bottleneck controller that combines a gated recurrent unit (GRU) with a graphconvolutional edge-activation mask, designed to adapt a U-Net-style segmentation backbone to missing input. We evaluate NeuroMesh in a pilot study using a 30-patient subset of the BraTS 2020 benchmark (22 training, 4 validation, and 4 held-out test patients) under a prespecified frozentest protocol. On the frozen test set, NeuroMesh has higher tumor-core and enhancing-tumor Dice than a plain U-Net in most evaluated missing-modality conditions, but wholetumor Dice falls from 0.596 to 0.108 when FLAIR is missing, compared with 0.604 to 0.545 for the plain U-Net. Direct analysis of the predicted edge-activation mask shows negligible change across modality-availability conditions. A parameter-light static-gating control reproduces the FLAIR failure mode without recurrence, a failure-signal input, or graph-structured machinery. These results do not support the intended interpretation that the trained controller performs input-conditional topology rewiring at the scale of this pilot. Instead, they expose a discrepancy between architectural intent and realized behavior and identify a specific missing-modality failure mode that warrants further investigation. Given the small validation and test sets, the findings are descriptive and do not establish clinical or population-level generalization.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 28 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement