Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Scalable spatial DNA sequencing from archival tissue maps copy number subclones

Created on 28 Aug 2026

Abstract

Spatially resolved DNA sequencing holds promise due to its potential utility in understanding cancer intra-tumour heterogeneity and tumour evolution in relation to tissue architecture. However, it has so far been used to a limited extent due to technical challenges and high cost of existing methods. Hence we aimed to develop a high throughput spatial genomic assay to obtain copy number alteration (CNA) information at user-defined spatial resolution. We derived CNA profiles from ultra-low coverage whole genome sequencing at sub-millimetre resolution from archival samples using a novel method called Adaptive Resolution Multiscale Spatial DNA sequencing (ARMS DNAseq). We used it to profile CNAs from more than 766 regions (tiles) from 3 patients, covering a total area of over 300 mm2, with 1.2-2.6 million mapped reads per tile and tile sizes of 0.1-0.99mm2. Using ARMS DNAseq, we delineate tumour evolution in a spatial context, and identify more tumour subclones that were obscured or incompletely represented in bulk multi-region whole genome sequencing. Next, we show associations between tumour subclones and morphology, and prediction of subclone identity from deep learning-derived image representations. Finally, we demonstrate multi-omic integration by alignment with spatial transcriptomic data, showing subclone-specific immune cell co-occurrence as well as transcriptional programmes cutting across subclone boundaries. ARMS DNAseq converts low-throughput, region-by-region profiling into a scalable and adaptable workflow for direct spatial copy number profiling from archival tissue sections.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 28 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement