Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Viral infection patterns in ants are affected by colony structure and phylogenetic lineage

Created on 29 Aug 2026

Abstract

Across ant species, there are differences in how their societies are structured. Single-queened (monogynous) societies only have one reproducing queen in the colony, and new queens disperse and start colonies independently. In multiple-queened (polygynous) societies, the colony instead can contain several reproductive queens, and newborn queens often remain and reproduce within their natal colony. As a result, polygynous societies are comparatively larger, more genetically diverse, and can span large areas through several interconnected nests, whereas monogynous societies are typically smaller in scale. In this study, we investigated how these different social structures, as well as their phylogenetic lineage, affect the diversity (number of virus species per ant sample) and abundance (number of viral sequences per sample) of viruses in ants. We produced pooled RNA sequence libraries from 15 ant species, representing both monogynous and polygynous social structures, and the two largest ant subfamilies: Formicinae and Myrmicinae, with each library containing the RNA of up to 400 individual worker ants from a single population. We identified 168 virus species in total, of which 152 species were new to science. Out of these 168 viruses, 59 were active viruses based on the host immune response. We observed that polygynous ant species harbor a higher diversity of viruses and also tend to have higher virus abundance compared to monogynous species. Also, the ant subfamily Myrmicinae had a higher virus diversity than Formicinae. These findings highlight how social structure and evolutionary history shape viral diversity in ants.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 29 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement