Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Disrupting Myeloid Persistence and Replenishment Enables Sustained Control of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Created on 29 Aug 2026

Authors

Lung, B. C.-c., Leung, A. K.-k., Liu, S., Wong, C. W.-Y., Lai, T. H., Wong, I. Y.-h., Lung, C. C. H., Lo, A. W.-i., Kam, N.-W., Ko, J. M.-Y., Dai, W., Kwong, D. L.-w., Law, S., Scodeller, P., Lung, M., Yu, V. Z.

Abstract

Responses to macrophage-directed therapy can be transient because tumors preserve myeloid support through complementary persistence and replenishment. In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), CSF1R inhibition reduced established tumor-associated macrophages but was followed by expansion of Ly6C/CCR2-positive monocytic and Ly6G-positive granulocytic populations. Low-dose decitabine preferentially restricted recruited populations while sparing a LYVE1-associated macrophage state, exposing reciprocal pharmacologic blind spots. Combined treatment suppressed both arms and produced sustained control across patient-derived organoid xenograft, orthotopic, and immunocompetent models. Neutrophil depletion reproduced initial regression but not sustained control, indicating that the recruited escape arm extended beyond Ly6G-positive granulocytes. Single-cell profiling mapped these vulnerabilities onto a treatment-resolved myeloid architecture comprising a C1qa-positive TAM continuum, a C1qa-negative Ccr2/Ly6c2-high inflammatory monocytic-like compartment, and a LYVE1/MRC1-positive tissue-supportive macrophage state. Human ESCC contained corresponding macrophage programs and an adverse-outcome-associated LYVE1-rich niche. These findings identify state-aware coverage of complementary myeloid vulnerabilities as a strategy to overcome escape from macrophage-directed therapy.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 29 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement