Heartbeat-Related Bodily Processing Shapes Transition Patterns in Self-Related Spontaneous Thought

Authors

Sakuragi, M., Shinagawa, K., Terasawa, Y., Tanaka, Y., Umeda, S.

Abstract

Spontaneous thought changes over time, yet the moment-to-moment factors shaping these changes remain poorly understood. We examined whether heartbeat-related bodily processing, operating largely outside explicit awareness, is associated with the organization of ongoing thought. Forty adults performed an auditory attention task with intermittent thought probes in which auditory events were scheduled either 200 ms after each detected R peak (synch condition) or independently of ongoing cardiac timing (asynch condition), with occasional omissions in both conditions. Heartbeat-synchronous omissions in this paradigm have been shown to induce cardiac deceleration and modulate heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEPs). The score of the heartbeat counting task (HCT) served as a behavioral index related to cardiac interoceptive accuracy. The results showed that higher HCT score was associated with a stronger synch-asynch shift toward more self-related and less task/self-unrelated thought. HEPs showed a synch-related negative shift across several thought groups, although the magnitude of this condition effect did not reliably differ among thought groups. Overall thought-group distributions were similar across conditions, while transition analyses suggested a tendency in the synch condition toward more frequent transitions linking predominantly interoceptive stimulus-dependent thought with both on-task and self-related thought. Together, these findings suggest that heartbeat-related bodily processing may influence the organization of spontaneous thought, particularly in individuals with greater cardiac interoceptive accuracy. Bodily signals may therefore act as an automatic constraint on the ongoing stream of thought, biasing which thought contents and transitions become more likely over time.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 29 Aug 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.