Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Dynamic Hierarchical Interleaved Bloom Filter: An Updatable Index for Large-Scale Fast Sequence Search

Created on 31 Aug 2026

Authors

Seiler, E., Willemsen, M., Piro, V. C., Reinert, K.

Abstract

Motivation: A continued decrease in sequencing costs has facilitated the exponential increase in available sequencing data, with public databases like the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) reaching well in the order of petabases. This has been the incentive to develop more scalable tools for common bioinformatics tasks. One such task is the approximate searching of short sequence patterns like genes or reads in reference data sets. In recent years, a variety of indexing data structures have been proposed for searching large sequencing databases. The state-of-the-art index, the Hierarchical Interleaved Bloom Filter (HIBF) was first-in-class to index one million samples. To be useful for expanding repositories, it must be extended to support dynamic updates. Results: In this paper, we introduce a scalable and updatable sequence-search index by extending the HIBF with partial rebuilding to support efficient updates. We demonstrate the Dynamic HIBF's capacity for large-scale data by iteratively creating an index from over 100 TB of compressed reads across more than 39,000 full human RNA-Seq samples, updated in consecutive batches of 100. To benchmark against state-of-the-art tools, we evaluated incremental performance on a subset of 5,000 samples sub-sampled to 1% of their original read depth. In this comparative setting, the dynamic HIBF completed the sequential insertion of all 5,000 samples within 5 hours--24 to 65 times faster than competing methods and twice as fast as the static HIBF.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 31 Aug 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement