Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Destructive harvest validation of high-throughput measurements show that water use efficiency is unaffected by moderate drought in tobacco

Created on 01 Sep 2026

Authors

Stutz, S. S., Edquilang, R., Bernacchi, C. J., Ort, D. R.

Abstract

Water-use efficiency (WUE), the ratio of accumulated plant biomass to water lost through transpiration has conventionally been determined using a destructive single-point measurement. Recent advances in high-throughput phenotyping now enable repeated, non-destructive estimation of biomass and WUE. However, these digital measurements must be statistically validated against conventional destructive methods to validate their use as reliable proxies. Therefore, we compared digital biomass determined point clouds produced from multispectral camera scanners with destructive harvests across eight harvests using Samsun tobacco grown under both drought and high-water conditions. WUE efficiency, calculated using the digital biomass estimated from a point cloud and gravimetric water use determinations, were compared to destructive harvest determinations. The coefficient of variation (CV) showed there were no significant differences in digital and destructive measurements for either biomass or WUE. Indicating that digital measurements can be used in place of destructive measurements. Drought plants used significantly less water and were significantly smaller than high-water plants from Harvests 4 through 8. However, there were no significant differences in the ratio of evapotranspiration to leaf area or WUE, indicating that drought plants were simply smaller and used less water than the high-water plants. This work validates that estimating plant biomass from a digital point coupled with continuous gravimetric determination of water use provides a reliable nondestructive measure of WUE in high-throughput measurements across the full plant life cycle.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 01 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement