Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Structure-Constrained Intrinsic Timescales Across Tasks

Created on 02 Sep 2026

Authors

Wu, K., de Palma Aristides, R., Herzog, R., Mirasso, C. R., Sorrentino, P., Gollo, L. L.

Abstract

Intrinsic neural timescale (INT) quantifies the persistence of spontaneous neural dynamics and offers a principled metric for characterizing brain-wide temporal organization. Although a hierarchy of INTs has been established during rest, how task engagement reconfigures this organization and how it is constrained by the structural connectome (SC) remain poorly understood. Here, we systematically mapped whole-brain INT using high-resolution fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project during rest and seven tasks spanning working memory, gambling, motor, language, social, relational, and emotion domains. Task engagement induced robust, regionally heterogeneous changes in INT while largely preserving the brain-wide temporal hierarchy across cognitive states. SC-INT coupling remained strong but consistently decreased during tasks, indicating that anatomical architecture continues to constrain INT, although its influence is attenuated under task demands. To investigate these findings mechanistically, we employed a multiscale, whole-brain neuronal-network model, which revealed that INT increase and peak within a broad critical-like regime. Strong SC-INT coupling, as observed empirically, emerged in the subcritical regime, weakened progressively with increasing network excitability, and reversed in the supercritical regime. These results demonstrate that task engagement reconfigures INTs while maintaining their hierarchical organization, suggesting that both resting and task states operate largely within a common subcritical dynamical regime.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 02 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement