A century of soybean breeding increased photosynthetic capacity but not NPQ relaxation

Authors

Pereira de Oliveira, L., Attri, K., Doran, L., Leonelli, L. B., Long, S. P., Ainsworth, E.

Abstract

Accelerating photoprotective regulation to improve carbon assimilation is a promising strategy to increase crop productivity. Although rapid non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) relaxation has been validated as a target through metabolic engineering, it remains unclear whether conventional breeding has improved this trait. Here, we investigated whether more than a century of soybean breeding enhanced NPQ relaxation alongside light-saturated carbon assimilation and seed traits. We evaluated a historical panel of 24 soybean genotypes across vegetative and reproductive developmental stages by integrating NPQ relaxation, gas exchange parameters, xanthophyll-cycle pigment profiles, expression of key photoprotective genes (VDE, PsbS, and ZEP), seed number and seed weight. NPQ relaxation parameters were not consistently associated with genotype release year, seed number, or seed weight at either developmental stage. The only exception was the amplitude of the rapidly relaxing NPQ component (AqE), which was negatively correlated with all three variables during the reproductive stage. In contrast, genotype release year was positively associated with maximum net CO2 assimilation rate (Amax), maximum carboxylation rate of Rubisco (Vcmax), maximum electron transport rate (Jmax), seed number, and seed weight, while Amax and Vcmax were positively correlated with seed number and seed weight. These findings indicate that the greater photosynthetic capacity of modern genotypes was not accompanied by faster photoprotective response. Thus, photoprotective regulation has not kept pace with gains in photosynthetic capacity under field conditions. We conclude that rapid NPQ relaxation remains an important target for synchronizing photoprotection with the high photosynthetic capacity of modern soybean lines.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 02 Sep 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.