Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Preserved brain hierarchy supports residual vision without awareness after visual cortex damage

Created on 02 Sep 2026

Authors

Orsenigo, D., Luppi, A. I., Diano, M., Ciorli, T., Borriero, A., Willis, H. E., Petri, G., Bridge, H., Tamietto, M.

Abstract

Damage to the primary visual cortex causes loss of conscious vision, yet some patients retain the ability to respond to stimuli despite reporting no visual experience. Why similar lesions produce such different behavioral phenotypes remains unclear. While research to date has focused primarily on spared pathways that bypass V1, here we asked whether these divergent outcomes are also linked to the brain's intrinsic functional architecture. In the largest resting-state fMRI cohort of patients with unilateral V1 damage reported to date, we quantified information sharing between regions across cortical and subcortical parcels in blindsight-positive and blindsight-negative patients, as well as in age-matched healthy controls. Despite comparable lesions, the two patient groups displayed distinct hierarchical patterns on the cortex: B+ patients preserved a sensory-to-association organization as in healthy controls, whereas B- patients exhibited a marked flattening of this hierarchy. The effect was driven by abnormally low shared-information coupling within unimodal cortices and scaled continuously with single-subject behavioral blind-field detection performance. A thalamic region consistent with the pulvinar, linking the contralesional visual cortex and the frontal eye field, discriminated B+ from B- patients. These findings highlight the system-level consequences of V1 damage supporting blindsight, suggesting that the unimodal-transmodal axis might track not only global states of consciousness, but also whether sensory information can guide behavior without awareness.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 02 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement