Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Systemic hypoxia drives glycogen-fueled progression of lung adenocarcinoma

Created on 04 Sep 2026

Abstract

In advanced stages, lung adenocarcinoma obstructs airways and disrupts ventilation-perfusion relationships in the lung, causing systemic hypoxemia and enabling a feed-forward loop that accelerates malignancy. Systemic hypoxemia is also experienced due to common respiratory comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), potentially accelerating malignancy. In a statewide electronic health record network, pre-existing COPD (598 matched pairs) or sleep apnea (235 matched pairs) independently predicted worse survival following incident lung cancer diagnosis. Since the mechanistic basis of the link between malignancy and hypoxia is not well understood, we created systemic hypoxia in KrasLSL-G12D/+;Trp53fl/fl (KP) mice by delivering low inspired oxygen concentrations (8% inspired oxygen; 8 h daily). Hypoxia nearly doubled tumor multiplicity and selectively remodeled cancer central carbon metabolism. Spatially resolved metabolomics revealed marked tumor-compartment glycogen accumulation, elevated tricarboxylic-acid cycle intermediates, and depleted glycolytic pools. Quantitative proteomics across cellular models and autochthonous tumors demonstrated that systemic hypoxia drives glycogen mobilization selectively through the lysosomal enzyme acid -glucosidase (GAA). Tumor-cell-autonomous deletion of GAA eliminated the hypoxia-driven growth advantage and disrupted downstream anabolic biosynthetic pathways. Thus, systemic hypoxia drives lung adenocarcinoma expansion by mobilizing lysosomal glycogen reserves through GAA to sustain proliferative growth.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 04 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement