Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Out-of-sight partners: autonomous wearable supernumerary limbs for dynamic co-manipulation

Created on 08 Sep 2026

Authors

Verdel, D., Xu, B., Cervantes-Culebro, H., Devillard, A., Mattioli, L., Farina, D., Soueres, P., Burdet, E.

Abstract

Supernumerary robotic limbs (SLs) could extend human motor capabilities beyond the natural body, yet most demonstrations have been limited to simple, quasi-static tasks or direct teleoperation under visual control. Whether humans can safely and intuitively collaborate with autonomous SLs during complex, dynamic tasks remains unknown. We studied this question in a demanding assembly task requiring coordinated transport and handovers of a long object, which could not be completed by a single person. We developed a reconfigurable backpack platform mounting up to four high-payload robotic arms, together with safety-aware motion planning that generates human-compatible trajectories from task states without training data. Despite the SLs operating out of sight, participants adapted quickly, completed the task reliably, and reported low cognitive demand alongside high perceived safety and predictability. Kinematic and force analyses showed that control design governed both movement fluency and whole-body stability: faster limb motions yielded smoother interactions and shorter completion times, and a mirrored coordination strategy--in which one robotic limb counterbalanced the other--further shortened duration and reduced variability in left-right ground reaction force differences during co-manipulation. These results show that humans can integrate autonomous wearable limbs as out-of-sight partners in dynamic whole-body collaboration, and delineate behavioral and control principles underpinning fluency, stability, and usability in human augmentation.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 08 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 18
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement