Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Towards Automated Acoustic Monitoring of Threatened Birds in Tropical Forest Ecosystem Restoration

Created on 11 Sep 2026

Authors

Fortune, H. X.-X., Banks-Leite, C.

Abstract

Forest restoration has become a widespread response to deforestation and biodiversity loss, particularly across the tropics. Monitoring restoration is essential for tracking progress and requires accurate knowledge of baseline communities, with threatened species often used as recovery indicators. Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) combined with AI classifiers is enabling this at scale. However, such tools remain immature and may underperform for rare, threatened species underrepresented in training data. Here, we demonstrate the potential of PAM assisted by the AI classifier BirdNET+ V3.0, a January 2026 beta release, to support monitoring of threatened tropical birds. By validating 995 detections from 8,940 hours of audio across a reforestation landscape in Para in the Brazilian Amazon, we found that BirdNET+ confirmed the presence of ~43% of the IUCN Red List threatened species possible in the region, five of which were the first confirmed records for the study site. We also found that this method outperformed traditional survey methods. However, BirdNET+ identified species with mixed reliability, and we could also not determine whether restoration has had any impact on them. Our results demonstrate that PAM with BirdNET+ is a viable, practical method for detecting threatened birds in tropical forest restoration landscapes, but that conventional validation approaches are not appropriate for such species, for which extensive validation effort is an essential cost. Under circumstances where this is not possible, we demonstrate validating the single highest-confidence detection per occasion as a practical alternative.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement