Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

FANCM restrains structural genome evolution and defines a synthetic lethal dependency in BRCA1-deficient breast cancer

Created on 11 Sep 2026

Authors

Panday, A., Ramadan, F., Shah, S. B., Subedi, U., Stephens, Z. D., Venkatachalam, A., Yadav, N., Pandit, V., Dubey, S., Latka, S., Villanueva, H., Kaufmann, S. H.

Abstract

BRCA1 deficient cancers experience persistent replication stress and structural genome instability yet retain the capacity for sustained proliferation, implying reliance on compensatory genome-maintenance mechanisms. Here, we establish BRCA1/FANCM synthetic lethality in human BRCA1 deficient breast cancer and exploit temporally controlled FANCM depletion to capture genome evolution over successive cell divisions before declining cellular fitness becomes limiting. We show that FANCM restrains genome wide structural variation in BRCA1 deficient breast cancer cells under endogenous replication stress. FANCM loss amplifies the characteristic BRCA1 associated short tandem duplication (TD) phenotype while permitting larger, including megabase-scale, TDs and diverse rearrangements to emerge. Newly emerged TDs preferentially associate with Pol II occupied regions, and FANCM depletion increases proximity between the replication machinery and elongating RNAPII in BRCA1 mutant breast cancer cells, linking FANCM-mediated genome protection to transcription replication encounters. BRCA1 altered human tumors with low FANCM expression recapitulate key features of this phenotype, while genome/transcriptome integration links newly emerged SVs to configuration dependent local transcriptional changes. Together, these findings establish FANCM as a replication stress safeguard coupling survival to restraint of structural genome evolution.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 11 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 34
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement