Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Structures of MeCP2 bound to nucleosomes reveal distinct mechanisms of Rett syndrome mutations

Created on 12 Sep 2026

Authors

Yao, L., Valderrama-Hincapie, C., Song, J., Kelly, I., Chuong, E. B., Kasinath, V.

Abstract

Methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2) is a chromatin-associated regulator essential for neuronal gene regulation, and pathogenic mutations in MeCP2 cause Rett syndrome (RTT). However, the mechanisms governing MeCP2 engagement on chromatin and the effects of RTT mutations on nucleosome interactions remain poorly understood. We determined cryo-EM structures of MeCP2 bound to mono-nucleosomes with or without linker DNA methylation. In the absence of linker DNA methylation, the methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) engages nucleosomal DNA near superhelical location +/- 7, whereas a methylated linker CpG redirects MBD to the linker methylation site. Quantitative EMSA, MNase footprinting, and fluorescence polarization show that both MBD and AT-hook regions cooperate to stabilize nucleosome binding, and that six common RTT variants (R133C, T158M, R306C, R168X, R255X, R270X) fall into four mechanistic classes. Loss-of-function truncations progressively weaken binding, whereas missense variants show near-WT DNA affinity. Among the variants, R133C shows near wild-type affinity for naked DNA but loses methylation-directed nucleosome engagement. Our analysis of human neuronal transcriptomic and chromatin occupancy datasets showed that RTT variants R133C and R168X lose CpG-island specificity and redistribute in the genome through distinct biochemical routes. Together, this work establishes a framework linking variant-specific defects in nucleosome binding to chromatin-targeting failure and transcriptional dysregulation in RTT.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 12 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 15
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement