Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Genotoxicity and 90-day oral toxicity of a monk fruit (Siraitia grosvenorii) mogroside preparation (>=95% mogrosides) produced by microbial fermentation

Created on 12 Sep 2026

Authors

Santos, C. N. S., M, S. S., Paneliya, S. M., Pawluk, M., A, S., Chaturvedula, V. S. P.

Abstract

Here we report genotoxicity and 90-day oral toxicity evaluations of a high-purity, fermentation-derived mogroside preparation rich in mogroside V, the principal sweetener of monk fruit (Siraitia grosvenorii). The test article ([≥]95% total mogrosides, 70.3% mogroside V) is produced by a modified Escherichia coli from glucose, offering a higher-purity alternative to traditional monk fruit extracts. The test article was non-mutagenic in a bacterial reverse mutation test (OECD TG 471) and non-clastogenic in an in vitro human lymphocyte micronucleus test (OECD TG 487), up to the maximum recommended concentration. In the 90-day study (OECD TG 408), the test article was given by daily oral gavage at 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg body weight/day to Sprague-Dawley rats. There were no deaths and no test article-related effects on clinical signs, ophthalmology, functional observational battery, body weight, food consumption, clinical pathology, thyroid hormones, oestrous cyclicity, or sperm parameters. Minor liver-weight increases lacking any clinical chemistry or histopathological correlates were determined to be non-adverse. No effects were seen on testis weight, sperm endpoints, or spermatogenesis. All other statistically significant differences were minor and considered incidental. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was 2000 mg/kg body weight/day, the highest dose tested, supporting its safety as a food ingredient.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 12 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement