Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A Framework for Quantifying DNA Methylation Heterogeneity and Detecting Co-methylated loci from Native Nanopore Sequencing

Created on 14 Sep 2026

Authors

Kim, Y. J., Zabet, N. R.

Abstract

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism involved in gene regulation. Most methods focus on analysing DNA methylation averaged from multiple reads, yet these average methylation profiles obscure heterogeneity between individual DNA molecules and coordinated methylation states across loci. Native Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) sequencing directly captures long, native DNA molecules together with their base modifications, allowing methylation to be studied at single-molecule resolution. Here, we present a scalable framework for genome-wide methylation analysis using ONT sequencing at single-molecule resolution, focused on two features that site-level summaries cannot recover. First, it quantifies molecule-to-molecule heterogeneity in DNA methylation by detecting Variable Methylated Domains (VMDs) and Variable Methylated Regions (VMRs). Second, it identifies coordinated methylation, as co-methylated positions (CMPs) and regions (CMRs), from the states observed on the same individual DNA molecules. Using data from human LCL cells, we demonstrate that substantial molecule-level methylation heterogeneity is masked by site-level summaries. Co-methylation analysis reveals coordinated patterns between CpG sites and genomic regions, including shared and sex-specific patterns, uncovering methylation organisation not apparent from average methylation levels. We also show that CMPs can be used to detect TF-pairs that are predicted to have coordinated binding. This framework is integrated within the DMRcaller R/Bioconductor package.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 14 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement