Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Dopaminergic tone predicts rhythmic temporal attention in Parkinson's disease

Created on 15 Sep 2026

Authors

Yosef, B., Balamurugan, B., Miura, M., Cross, K.

Abstract

Beat perception, the ability to perceive and anticipate a regular pulse in music, is thought to depend on the basal ganglia. Dopaminergic signaling is a candidate mechanism given its prominence in basal ganglia circuitry and established function in encoding temporal predictions. Parkinson's disease (PD) provides a model for studying dopaminergic contributions to beat perception. To test the hypothesis that higher dopaminergic tone is associated with better beat perception, we conducted a study in PD patients (n=55) and matched controls (n=53). Participants performed a musical beat perception task, the Beat Drop Alignment Test (BDAT). They also completed a non-timing control task measuring musical pitch perception, the Mistuning Perception Test (MPT). We identified a double dissociation in PD patients: daily dopamine dose was associated with beat perception (r=.37, p=.005) but not pitch perception (r=.12, p=.397), while musical background was associated with pitch perception (r=.55, p<.001) but not beat perception (r=.16, p=.236). Results remained consistent when controlling for disease duration and age. This dissociation suggests the effect of dopamine is specific to beat perception and not reflective of a general improvement in auditory processing. High-dopamine patients outperformed both low-dopamine patients and age-matched controls, and this difference was driven by better detection of on-beat than off-beat events. Together, these results suggest that dopamine is associated with enhanced beat perception, potentially through modulation of temporal attention to expected beat times.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 15 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement