Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Mapping heterogeneity drivers in human PSC-derived limbal stem cell differentiation through single-cell multi-modal analysis

Created on 18 Sep 2026

Authors

Arts, J. A., Lima Cunha, D., Harjuntausta, S., Vattulainen, M., Smits, J. G., Bonthuis, I., Fragoso Bento, D., Bocci, F., Skottman, H., Zhou, H.

Abstract

Understanding the molecular underpinnings of stem cell differentiation is pivotal for generating appropriate cell types in cell-based therapies. Differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (PSC) into corneal limbal stem cells offers a promising avenue to regenerate the corneal epithelium. However, current differentiation strategies remain inconsistent in efficiency and yield heterogeneous cell populations that incompletely recapitulate the regenerative properties of donor-derived limbal stem cells. Here, we mapped the molecular landscape of cell states throughout the differentiation process. First, we construct PSC differentiation paths from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data using the computational framework of optimal transport, identifying on- and off-track cell states toward the limbal stem cell state. Single cell Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin sequencing (scATAC-seq) was performed to profile accessible genomic regions, and subsequently integrated with scRNA-seq data through gene regulatory network analysis to identify key drivers governing the diverse cell states. We showed that genomic enhancers play a major role in cell state determinations. Through this single-cell multi-modal approach, we identified potential transcription factors driving limbal epithelial lineage specification and off-track cell populations. Our findings provide a framework for rational optimization of PSC-derived limbal stem cell generation to advance the development of corneal cell therapies.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 18 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement