Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

DiffDomain-Spectrum identifies structurally reorganized TADs from sparse aggregated single-cell Hi-C contact maps

Created on 18 Sep 2026

Authors

Zhu, J., Zhang, H., Du, Y., Zhang, X., Zhou, Y., Tian, D.

Abstract

Structurally reorganized topologically associating domains (TADs) capture condition- or cell-type-specific remodeling of chromatin contacts and are important for understanding genome organization in health and disease. Emerging single-cell Hi-C (scHi-C) technologies enable such comparisons across heterogeneous cell populations, but aggregated scHi-C contact maps remain sparse at biologically meaningful 25 kb resolution, limiting reliable TAD reorganization detection. Here we present DiffDomain-Spectrum, a spectral statistical framework for identifying reorganized TADs between conditions or cell types from aggregated raw scHi-C contact maps. It tests normalized TAD-level difference matrices without separately normalizing sparse maps or enhancing individual scHi-C contact maps. Comparison with a semicircle-law null integrates evidence across the full eigenvalue spectrum. Across multiple scHi-C platforms, DiffDomain-Spectrum balances false positive control and detection sensitivity relative to alternative bulk callers, and detects a substantially higher proportion of reference TADs as reorganized than the boundary-focused single-cell method scHiCluster. Detected TADs show coherent aggregate contact patterns and CTCF binding changes and are enriched for differentially expressed genes, supporting biological relevance. Together, these results establish DiffDomain-Spectrum as a statistically principled framework for comparative domain-level analysis of sparse aggregated scHi-C contact maps without single-cell map enhancement.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 18 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement