Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Predicting Neoantigen Immunogenicity from In Vivo Immune Editing

Created on 19 Sep 2026

Authors

Sears, T. J., Lee, K.-h., Munoz Perez, M., Rasmussen, R., Pagadala, M. S., Tanaka, K., Subramanian, A., Moding, E. J., Zanetti, M., Carter, H.

Abstract

Neoantigen immunogenicity prediction is fundamental to personalized cancer vaccines, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, and TCR-T cell engineering. Existing computational predictors rely primarily on in-vitro correlates of peptide presentation or models trained against assay-based reactivity, and they are typically validated within a single therapeutic setting. We reasoned that the most direct evidence of neoantigen immunogenicity is longitudinal in-vivo elimination: under immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), subclones bearing recognized neoantigens are selectively depleted over time. Here, we present the Neoantigen Elimination Model (NEMo), a two-compartment (CD8 and CD4) machine learning classifier trained on the in-vivo editing (IVE) of neoantigens across serially sequenced, ICB-treated tumors. By using mechanistically inspired NeoPrecis features designed to capture determinants of immunogenicity beyond MHC binding affinity, NEMo recovered assay-confirmed immunogenic neoantigens across four independent, unseen clinical settings -- pre-existing immunogenicity screening, personalized cancer vaccines, TIL therapy, and a radiotherapy +/- ICB ctDNA cohort -- and stratified progression-free survival more strongly than ELISPOT-confirmed reactivity. The editing signal further revealed an immune-evasion architecture in which oncogenic drivers and neoantigens restricted to lost or silenced HLA alleles are systematically spared from editing.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 19 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement