Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Sustained 10% Oxygen Promotes Atrial Rather Than Ventricular Specification During Human iPSC-Cardiomyocyte Differentiation

Created on 22 Sep 2026

Authors

Mathiesen, S. B., Bjerre, F. A., Terp, A. K. S., Ellman, D. G., Larsen, J. H., Horn, P. B., Svenningsen, P., Poon, E. N.-Y., Jensen, C. H., Andersen, D. C.

Abstract

Background: Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived ventricular cardiomyocytes (iPSC-vCMs) hold great promise for replacing ventricular cardiomyocytes lost after myocardial infarction. However, their immature phenotype limits successful engraftment by increasing the risk of post-transplant arrhythmias. In contrast to the atmospheric O2 used during most iPSC-vCM differentiations, O2 levels inside the developing heart remain low, but very little is known on the effect on O2 on iPSC-vCM differentiation. Methods: We used a GMP compliant Quad Physoxia glovebox platform providing continuous stable specified O2 tensions during all processes to simulate the in vivo O2 conditions more closely with the aim of improving iPSC-vCM maturation. Results: We demonstrate by single cell RNA sequencing, and data integration with datasets for human cardiomyocytes from the different heart chambers as well as cell morphology-, ploidy-, and functional studies, that sustained 10% O2 throughout iPSC-CM differentiation promotes atrial- instead of ventricular iPSC-CM subtype specification. Conclusions: While this rejects our original hypothesis and forces some concerns to iPSC-vCM manufacturing by sphere technology, these unexpected data may serve as an attractive and easy approach to refine atrial iPSC-CM specification to benefit their exponentially growing diagnostic-, cytotoxic-, and regenerative use.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 22 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement