Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Reaction-aware hypergraph learning of chemical representations with LARK

Created on 23 Sep 2026

Authors

Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Jin, J., Wang, D., Zou, Q., Su, R., Wei, L.

Abstract

Molecular pretraining offers a route to learning transferable chemical representations from unlabelled data. However, existing approaches pretrained on isolated molecular structures struggle to generalize to reaction-specific tasks because their pretraining objectives provide limited information about chemical transformations. A key challenge is to integrate this reaction information into chemical representations. Here we introduce LARK, a unified framework for learning atom-molecule-reaction knowledge from chemical transformations. Using approximately 0.6 million reactions encompassing 0.88 million unique molecular components, LARK combines bidirectional bond-electron reconstruction with structural and geometric supervision through a role-aware hierarchical hypergraph Transformer that links local atom representations to reaction context. The learned representations transfer to both reaction prediction and single-molecule property prediction, with strong performance across 42 tasks covering reaction outcomes, physicochemical properties, toxicity, metabolism and pharmacokinetics. Reactioncentre analyses show that LARK identifies where bonds break and form, while targeted interventions reveal that the learned atom representations contribute to reconstructing these changes. These findings indicate that LARK learns chemically informative representations of substructures involved in molecular transformations. Together, the results establish chemical transformations as a source of structured supervision for representation learning across molecular and reaction scales.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 23 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement