Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

An atlas of eukaryotic centromere architecture reveals recurrent evolutionary dynamics

Created on 24 Sep 2026

Abstract

Centromeres evolved at the root of eukaryotes to segregate chromosomes during cell division. Despite their ancient origin, centromeric DNA sequences evolve rapidly and adopt diverse architectures, including point centromeres, satellite arrays, transposon clusters, and holocentrics. To analyse centromere evolution at a broad scale, we characterised architectures across 325 diverse Darwin Tree of Life genome assemblies. Centromere architecture is evolutionarily labile, and similar configurations arise independently across divergent lineages. In plants and animals, we modelled centromere evolution as a recurrent cycle, in which satellite- and transposon-based architectures interconvert, with independent origins of holocentricity. We curated >23 million satellite repeats comprising 263 families from 165 species. Despite sequence divergence between satellite families, higher order repeats are prevalent, indicating constraint on repeat architecture rather than primary sequence. Satellite arrays are heavily invaded by diverse transposon families, consistent with convergent adaptation to the centromeric niche. In 89 species, transposons themselves constitute the primary centromere structure. We observed centrophilic transposons forming tandem arrays, suggesting mechanisms for satellite regeneration. Our sample includes five independent origins of holocentricity in plants and animals, which vary in association with periodic satellite arrays. We propose that genetic instability, centrophilic transposition, and transmission distortion promote recurrent centromere architectural interconversions during evolution.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 24 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement