Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Potassium deficiency reinforces the endodermal but not the exodermal suberized barrier in maize seminal roots

Created on 24 Sep 2026

Authors

Liu, T., Dittert, K., Cakmak, I., Gerendas, J., Grunhofer, P., Zeisler-Diehl, V., Schreiber, L., Kreszies, T.

Abstract

Potassium (K) deficiency is a widespread constraint on maize production, yet how it influences the suberized apoplastic barriers that control radial K transport in roots, and whether the endodermis and the constitutively suberized exodermis respond differently, has remained unclear. We grew maize under K deficiency in soil and across a hydroponic K gradient, with abscisic acid (ABA) and fluridone treatments, and analysed seminal roots by Fluorol Yellow 088 staining, tissue-resolved suberin chemistry of endodermis and exodermis, rubidium (Rb) flux, and RNA-sequencing with weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). K deficiency selectively increased endodermal aliphatic suberin and eliminated endodermal passage cells in soil-grown roots, whereas exodermal suberin was unchanged. Although K influx remained high, root-to-shoot Rb translocation fell sharply, consistent with K retention. A single co-expression module linked the suberin-biosynthetic genes with several K transport genes, and the suberin programme responded to exogenous ABA, indicating ABA-dependent co-regulation. Soil and hydroponic systems converged on the same endodermis-specific anatomical response. Endodermal, but not exodermal, barrier reinforcement limits K leakage from the stele in maize roots. This tissue-specific plasticity identifies the endodermal suberin biosynthesis programme, and its coordination with K uptake, as a target for improving K use efficiency.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 24 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 14
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement