Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

A knockout screening platform for interferon-stimulated genes in respiratory cells identifies LY6E as a dominant antiviral effector against coronaviruses

Created on 24 Sep 2026

Authors

Stoddard, C. I., Litchford, M. L., Sung, K., Hutcheson, R. L., Marceau, J., Johnson, T., Ota, A., Baumgarten, N. E., Gale, M., Overbaugh, J.

Abstract

Human coronaviruses (HCoVs) cause pathogenic outcomes ranging from mild illness to severe respiratory disease. Determining how respiratory cells coordinate an early antiviral response is necessary to understand successful control of HCoV replication. The Type I Interferon (IFN) response is a major component of innate viral immunity. IFN signaling leads to the upregulation of hundreds of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) that can have antiviral activity, though the individual ISGs that are responsible for restricting mildly pathogenic HCoVs in the respiratory epithelium are not clear. Here, we developed a targeted CRISPR-Cas9 knockout sgRNA library (termed the respISG library), focusing on ISGs that are upregulated across a panel of respiratory cells, to screen for innate host factors that restrict the mildly pathogenic human coronavirus, HCoV-OC43. We executed cell death-based screens in immortalized human small airway epithelial cells and identified lymphocyte antigen 6E (LY6E) as a top hit. We confirmed LY6E activity in validation studies and found it regulates entry of various SARS-CoV-2 Spike-pseudotyped lentiviruses. In addition to demonstrating a key role for LY6E in blocking a variety of HCoVs in small airway epithelial cells, this study establishes a loss-of-function CRISPR-Cas9 screening platform for identification of HCoV antiviral ISGs in respiratory cells.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 24 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement