Local structural preference maps encode transferable protein-interface energetics

Authors

Kienlein, M., Menezes, F., Grass, P., Munker, S., Siebenmorgen, T., Popowicz, G. M.

Abstract

Relating the drivers of binding affinity to structural features remains difficult because affinity emerges from many weak, context-dependent interactions, while experimental affinity and mutation data are limited. Here, we ask whether a machine-learning model can learn energetically relevant interaction preferences directly from native structures, without affinity or mutation labels. We decompose interfaces into local structural motifs and learn the compatibility of each motif with its surrounding molecular environment. Applied across a protein surface, these models yield target preference maps (TPMs), spatial fields of local interaction compatibility. Trained exclusively on native antibody-antigen structures without affinity or mutation labels, TPMs recover charged, aromatic and backbone-mediated recognition across peptide-protein and other non-antibody interfaces. On an out-of-domain SKEMPI benchmark, wild-type TPM scores discriminated mutation-sensitive positions (AUC 0.643, n=1323), while TPM-based substitution scores ranked alternative amino acids comparably to FoldX and Rosetta Flex {Delta}{Delta}G. These results show that native interface structures can supervise learning of transferable, energetically relevant molecular preferences without direct thermodynamic labels.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 25 Sep 2026.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.