Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Axonal entry and retrograde transport define HSV-1 latency establishment and reactivation potential in neurons

Created on 26 Sep 2026

Authors

Pantoja, C., Loaiza, A. D. D., Luong, K. T. Y., Koyuncu, O. O.

Abstract

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) establishes life-long latency in peripheral neurons following neuroinvasion, yet the early determinants governing latency versus productive infection remain poorly understood. Available in vitro models bypass the physiological route of infection by directly infecting neuronal cell bodies under antiviral suppression. Here, we established a compartmented axonal infection model that recapitulates HSV-1 neuroinvasion and latency establishment without pharmacological inhibitors. Using primary superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons, we demonstrated that low-dose axonal infection consistently establishes latency, whereas higher axonal doses or direct somatic infection led to productive replication. Latently infected neurons exhibit accumulation of the latency-associated transcript (LAT) and can be efficiently reactivated by UV-inactivated virus or VP16 expression. Remarkably, productive infection can be induced during low-dose axonal infection by simultaneous exposure of neuronal cell bodies, but not axons, to replication-deficient virions, implicating tegument delivery in soma overrides latency establishment. Conversely, excess replication-incompetent particles in axons suppress productive outcomes and subsequent reactivations, suggesting competition for retrograde transport. Together, these findings identify axonal entry and transport as critical regulatory checkpoints in HSV-1 latency establishment and suggest that interference with retrograde trafficking may represent a strategy to limit neuroinvasion and life-long reactivations.

Preprint server: bioRxiv
The authors list and abstract were imported from bioRxiv on 26 Sep 2026.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this preprint? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 73
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement